by bwhaleml
Don't let the flamers worry you. There are lots of Lit readers who relish bi erotica. Thanks for sharing your work with us!
Thanks fog43 for the encouragement.
gordo12 thanks for taking the time to comment too. however you may find my stories do not suit your tastes. i'm pretty sure my missives are going to offend your sensibilities so perhaps you may wish to connect with another author. one whose stories fit your views better than mine do.
Mike
but the most recent findings are lower than those cited by him.
"Less than 3 percent of the U.S. population identify themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Tuesday in the first large-scale government survey measuring Americans’ sexual orientation.
"The National Health Interview Survey, which is the government’s premier tool for annually assessing Americans’ health and behaviors, found that 1.6 percent of adults self-identify as gay or lesbian, and 0.7 percent consider themselves bisexual.
"The overwhelming majority of adults, 96.6 percent, labeled themselves as straight in the 2013 survey. An additional 1.1 percent declined to answer, responded “I don’t know the answer” or said they were “something else.”"
/>
I do not judge those who embrace the LGBT lifestyles but I resent the forcing of those lifestyles on others in order to gain some sort of legitimacy. The already are legitimate choices but not for the vast majority of the human race who are wired differently.
Just as offensive and intellectually bankrupt is that argument that those of us who object to the attempt to mainstream the gay lifestyle choice in loving and the blatant attempt to force it down our throats (We're here, we're queer, get used to it.) as repressed homosexuals who are afraid to experiment.- Bunk
Why the need to recruit? To change minds so more will try man-"love"? Most LGBT activists and leaders have made the point that sexual preference is NOT a matter of choice or nurture. It's a matter of nature and studies (not the flamboyant self determining stuff of the past) have shown that nature has allowed for fewer than 3% of us to identify as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, or Transgender. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with those preferences. Laurel and company have provided hubs for those of those preferences. Why the need to post them elsewhere?
I think those authors who post in LW and other hubs discriminate against themselves and the LGBT communities. They are the true haters here, along with their very vocal supporters in these squabbles.
I do not oppose gay marriage and I suspect that Gordo12 doesn't either. I don't want to limit expression of sexual preference and I think that's true of the vast majority of readers here. I just wish authors would have the courtesy to post stories that interest themselves and their audiences in the hubs provided so that I and countless others don't waste time on them. If they can't do something as simple as that, what does it say about them?
As for those who are feeling "triggered" by this erotic story - Yep: the percentage of women and men who engage in same-sex behavior to orgasm is in the 55-60 % range, and the percentage of those who "identify" as gay or bisexual is under 5%.
The difference can be attributed to the fact that most people have the bandwidth to realize that occasional or even more frequent behavior of a certain kind doesn't require the assumption of an "identity." They're just people who have had same sex experiences they apparently found gratifying to a greater or lesser degree.
You can keep thinking of this as a certain "kind" of person. But you'll find yourself in thin company. Most of the world is moving on from that. The Taliban, however, still agrees with those who think there's a "gay agenda" at work here.
There's not. It's just sex. And sometimes, affection. Scary.
Great story so far - looking forward to more.
First, you can write anything you want. Personally, I edit stories within my head to make them more along the lines that turn me on the most. I think your quoting stats from Kinsley sort of missed the point. There is nothing "wrong" with M on M action within a heterosexual cuckold story, however, part of the "cuckold" bent is an intense sexual devotion and excitement from ones partner. In other words, the guy is totally emotionally captivated by his wife or girlfriend. To make him also attracted to a guy, works against your main premise on which the "cuckold type" story rests. If you want to incorporate M on M, then it should probably within the context of his girlfriend / wife ordering him (harshly, gently, encouragingly, etc.) to do something that would please her either because the thought of it turns her on or because seeing her boyfriend / husband do something totally against his nature as a show of his love for her, turns her on. Within the cuckold story there are definite threads of humiliation and femdom (power exchange). In some cuckold stories the humiliation is intense AND the male is sometimes depicted as a wimp or sissy; these over-the-top cuckold depictions turn me on the least, though some light humiliation and light feminization for lack of a better description (like being forced to wear panties) is more of a turn-on specifically because it is AGAINST the male attraction type. I like your stories and I hope you can understand the comments in a positive way. The bi-male angle, while valid storyline, takes away from the "emotional intensity" you worked so hard to establish in the cuckold storyline from the earlier chapters.